Sierra Leonean vs Costa Rican Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Costa Rican
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Costa Ricans
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
64.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Costa Rican Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,227,965 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,586,429 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.34%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 0.45% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 10.4% | 27.6% |
| Range | 9.9% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 6.0% |
| Median | 4.4% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans and Costa Ricans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Ethiopian (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and Immigrants from Uganda (5.2%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
| Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
| Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
| Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |