Samoan vs Alaskan Athabascan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Samoan
Alaskan Athabascan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Samoans
Alaskan Athabascans
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Alaskan Athabascan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,807,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,659,111 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 16.8%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Samoan | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 1.7% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 64.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 62.3% | 99.2% |
Mean | 16.5% | 38.6% |
Median | 14.8% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 60.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 45.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 31.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 30.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.87%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.97%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |