Russian vs Turkish Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Russian
Turkish
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Russians
Turks
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Turkish Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,778,613 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,163,307 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 0.020%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.56% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 20.6% |
| Range | 99.4% | 17.1% |
| Mean | 16.4% | 8.8% |
| Median | 9.2% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.5% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Turks by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and New Zealander (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and New Zealander (10.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Macedonians | 98.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 98.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 98.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Canadians | 98.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Australians | 98.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Samoans | 98.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Palestinians | 97.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Russians | 97.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 97.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| New Zealanders | 97.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 97.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 97.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 97.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Koreans | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.1% |