Immigrants from Belarus vs Scottish Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Scottish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Scottish
11.6%
POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Scottish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,136,945 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,309,495 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Scottish |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 27.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 26.0% | 98.1% |
Mean | 11.1% | 20.9% |
Median | 10.3% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 23.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Scottish by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from China (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Slavic (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |