Osage vs Blackfeet Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Blackfeet
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Osage
Blackfeet
24.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Blackfeet Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,495,293 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132 and weighted average of 24.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,344,342 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 25.1%, a difference of 2.7%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64134/6413425106d4ef9dfe85929dc213430664e13e83" alt="Osage vs Blackfeet Single Female Poverty"
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Blackfeet |
Minimum | 10.2% | 6.1% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.8% | 93.9% |
Mean | 29.5% | 43.8% |
Median | 30.1% | 37.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.6% | 26.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.7% | 56.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 29.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 23.6% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Blackfeet by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.37%), American (24.5%, a difference of 0.44%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.59%), Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Mexican (25.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Shoshone (25.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and Yaqui (24.9%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |