Mongolian vs Puget Sound Salish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Puget Sound Salish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Puget Sound Salish
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Puget Sound Salish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,875,395 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,044,429 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.787 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Puget Sound Salish |
| Minimum | 0.35% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 14.5% | 26.4% |
| Range | 14.1% | 23.8% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 6.1% |
| Median | 4.5% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Puget Sound Salish by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Immigrants from Spain (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Hmong (5.0%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Soviet Union (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |