Mongolian vs Pennsylvania German Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Pennsylvania German
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Pennsylvania Germans
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Pennsylvania German Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,875,395 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,029,160 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mongolian | Pennsylvania German |
Minimum | 0.35% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 14.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 14.1% | 98.4% |
Mean | 5.0% | 9.9% |
Median | 4.5% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 10.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Pennsylvania Germans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Immigrants from Spain (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Ethiopian (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |