Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hmong
Puget Sound Salish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Hmong
Puget Sound Salish
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Puget Sound Salish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,044,429 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.787 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Puget Sound Salish |
Minimum | 0.50% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 10.7% | 26.4% |
Range | 10.2% | 23.8% |
Mean | 4.7% | 6.1% |
Median | 4.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 5.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Puget Sound Salish by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Egypt (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from China (5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Portugal (5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and German Russian (5.0%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Soviet Union (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | China | 84.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |