Mongolian vs Immigrants from Jordan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Immigrants from Jordan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Immigrants from Jordan
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
66.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Immigrants from Jordan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,875,395 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,872,287 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 0.35% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 14.5% | 25.3% |
| Range | 14.1% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 6.5% |
| Median | 4.5% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Immigrants from Jordan by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Immigrants from Spain (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Brazilian (5.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Ethiopian (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |