Marshallese vs Osage Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Osage
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Osage
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Osage Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,469,521 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,587,587 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 16.5%, a difference of 0.13%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Osage |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.1% | 95.0% |
| Mean | 38.6% | 31.8% |
| Median | 23.3% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | 40.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.1% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.7% | 24.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.3% | 23.6% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Osage by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.78%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.61%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.91%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |