Iroquois vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 18.8%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Iroquois	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	4.7%	10.7%
Maximum	100.0%	44.6%
Range	95.3%	33.9%
Mean	22.4%	16.8%
Median	16.7%	15.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.0%	12.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	25.5%	19.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.5%	6.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	19.0%	6.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	18.8%	6.7%

Similar Demographics by Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Mexican American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 15.6%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 15.6%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 15.6%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 15.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 15.7%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 15.8%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 15.8%
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 15.8%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 15.9%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #271	Tragic 15.9%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #272	Tragic 15.9%
Haitians	0.0 /100 \| #273	Tragic 15.9%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 15.9%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 16.0%
Central Americans	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 16.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Costa Ricans	63.6 /100 \| #159	Good 13.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	62.7 /100 \| #160	Good 13.3%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	62.5 /100 \| #161	Good 13.3%
Guamanians/Chamorros	62.4 /100 \| #162	Good 13.3%
Immigrants \| Albania	62.4 /100 \| #163	Good 13.3%
Ethiopians	62.3 /100 \| #164	Good 13.3%
Scotch-Irish	62.1 /100 \| #165	Good 13.3%
Immigrants \| Oceania	59.7 /100 \| #166	Average 13.3%
Immigrants \| Chile	57.4 /100 \| #167	Average 13.3%
Aleuts	56.7 /100 \| #168	Average 13.4%
Lebanese	55.9 /100 \| #169	Average 13.4%
Colombians	55.7 /100 \| #170	Average 13.4%
Whites/Caucasians	54.6 /100 \| #171	Average 13.4%
Mongolians	53.6 /100 \| #172	Average 13.4%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	50.8 /100 \| #173	Average 13.4%