Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Caribbean
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Caribbean
Immigrants from Oceania
16.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,490,616 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 26.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Caribbean | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 5.4% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 27.8% | 44.6% |
| Range | 22.4% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 16.8% |
| Median | 16.6% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Caribbean by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Caribbean are Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), African (16.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |