Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sweden
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sweden
Immigrants from Oceania
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,683,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 8.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 46.8% | 44.6% |
| Range | 45.4% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 16.8% |
| Median | 9.8% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sweden by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |