South American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Immigrants from Oceania
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
28.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,514,214 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 3.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 68.3% | 44.6% |
| Range | 65.9% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 16.8% |
| Median | 12.5% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.8% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Arab (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Uganda (13.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Iraqi (13.7%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
| Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
| Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |