Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hispanic or Latino
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Hispanics or Latinos
Immigrants from Oceania
16.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,030,648 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 16.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 25.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hispanic or Latino | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 11.3% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 39.4% | 44.6% |
| Range | 28.1% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 17.5% | 16.8% |
| Median | 16.3% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hispanics or Latinos by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hispanics or Latinos are Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Chippewa (16.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Somali (16.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and Mexican (16.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |