Hungarian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Hungarians
Immigrants from Oceania
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,692,155 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 73.9% | 44.6% |
| Range | 72.6% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 18.8% | 16.8% |
| Median | 12.1% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.0% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.6% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.5% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |