Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,692,358 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 2.5%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
Minimum | 4.7% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 32.1% |
Range | 95.3% | 30.1% |
Mean | 22.4% | 14.8% |
Median | 16.7% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |