Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Immigrants from Oceania
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,541,318 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 17.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cape Verdean | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 33.8% | 44.6% |
| Range | 31.8% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 16.8% |
| Median | 13.8% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |