Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from Oceania
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,083,750 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 0.26%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 30.1% | 44.6% |
| Range | 28.6% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 16.8% |
| Median | 12.2% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |