Greek vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Greek
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Greeks
Immigrants from Oceania
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,170,203 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 13.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Greek | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 0.85% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 44.6% |
| Range | 99.2% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 16.8% |
| Median | 9.9% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Greeks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |