Osage vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Osage
Chippewa
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,795,919 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 12.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 78.4% |
| Range | 29.7% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 25.6% |
| Median | 14.9% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Osage by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (14.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and Fijian (14.9%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |