Immigrants from Morocco vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Morocco
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Morocco
Chippewa
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Morocco vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,904,508 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 24.2%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Morocco | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.1% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 51.5% | 78.4% |
Range | 50.4% | 71.4% |
Mean | 14.1% | 25.6% |
Median | 12.1% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Morocco by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Celtic (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Syria (13.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |
Kenyans | 43.8 /100 | #183 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 43.2 /100 | #184 | Average 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |