Bulgarian vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Chippewa
11.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,544,553 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 50.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 0.25% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 53.6% | 78.4% |
| Range | 53.3% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 25.6% |
| Median | 8.5% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (11.0%, a difference of 0.89%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |