Polish vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Poles
Chippewa
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,323,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 42.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 87.1% | 78.4% |
| Range | 85.5% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 25.6% |
| Median | 10.3% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Poles by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |