Ecuadorian vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ecuadorians
Chippewa
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,585,196 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 9.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 0.14% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 28.7% | 78.4% |
| Range | 28.5% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 14.8% | 25.6% |
| Median | 14.1% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |