Immigrants from Thailand vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Alaskan Athabascans
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
9.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,654,872 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,790,128 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 4.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 48.3% | 76.9% |
| Range | 46.9% | 74.9% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 18.8% |
| Median | 11.9% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Malaysian (9.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |