South African vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Chinese
11.7%
POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 23.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 54.5% | 26.1% |
| Range | 53.2% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 10.2% |
| Median | 8.8% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Israel (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (11.8%, a difference of 0.090%), French (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 88.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 87.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.7% |
| South Africans | 87.0 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.8% |
| French | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Peruvians | 85.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 85.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |