Spanish American Indian vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Chinese
14.2%
POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,142,105 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 49.0%.
![Spanish American Indian vs Chinese Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/poverty/spanish-american-indians-vs-chinese-poverty-chart.webp)
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Chinese |
Minimum | 7.3% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 48.0% | 26.1% |
Range | 40.7% | 22.7% |
Mean | 16.0% | 10.2% |
Median | 13.8% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.2% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (14.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (14.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Cree (14.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |