Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chinese
12.0%
POVERTY
72.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,932,153 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 26.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 41.8% | 26.1% |
| Range | 39.3% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 10.2% |
| Median | 10.4% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
| Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |