Turkish vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Turks
Chinese
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,706,785 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 14.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 26.1% |
| Range | 18.0% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 10.2% |
| Median | 8.7% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Japan (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Asian (11.0%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |