Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chinese
12.0%
POVERTY
73.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,765,120 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 25.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.3% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 26.2% | 26.1% |
Range | 23.9% | 22.7% |
Mean | 10.5% | 10.2% |
Median | 10.2% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Syrian (12.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |