Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from India Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Taiwan
Immigrants from India
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Taiwan
Immigrants from India
9.7%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from India Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,124,801 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,739,641 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.604 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 7.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Taiwan | Immigrants from India |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.59% |
| Maximum | 22.5% | 16.8% |
| Range | 21.4% | 16.2% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 6.3% |
| Median | 8.2% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from India by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Chinese (9.5%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 3.7%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Chinese (9.5%, a difference of 5.6%), Thai (9.6%, a difference of 6.1%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 11.6%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 11.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |