Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chinese
13.8%
POVERTY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,230,350 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 44.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 37.0% | 26.1% |
| Range | 33.7% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 10.2% |
| Median | 14.0% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Immigrants from Laos (13.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Fijian (13.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Cuban (13.9%, a difference of 0.68%), Immigrants from Armenia (13.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and French American Indian (13.9%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Alaska Natives | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |