Immigrants from Taiwan vs Luxembourger Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Taiwan
Luxembourger
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Taiwan
Luxembourgers
9.7%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Luxembourger Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,124,801 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,648,044 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 8.8%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Taiwan | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 22.5% | 19.5% |
Range | 21.4% | 17.9% |
Mean | 8.0% | 7.5% |
Median | 8.2% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Taiwan and Luxembourgers by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Chinese (9.5%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 3.7%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Latvian (10.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |