Immigrants from South Africa vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Celtics
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,909,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 9.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Celtic |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.4% | 97.2% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 12.7% |
| Median | 6.4% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 12.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |