Immigrants from Bolivia vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Celtics
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,596,723 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 14.8%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 36.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.4% | 97.2% |
Mean | 7.8% | 12.7% |
Median | 6.4% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 12.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from North Macedonia (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Moldova (7.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |