Immigrants from Uganda vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Celtics
9.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
43.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,892,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 9.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Celtic |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 27.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.0% | 97.2% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 12.7% |
| Median | 8.3% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from Iraq (9.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Hmong (9.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Morocco (9.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Cameroon (9.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and Hawaiian (9.0%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |
| Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 44.4 /100 | #179 | Average 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 43.4 /100 | #180 | Average 9.1% |
| Hmong | 40.2 /100 | #181 | Average 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 40.2 /100 | #182 | Average 9.1% |