Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Celtics
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,352,430 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 3.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Celtic |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 19.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 18.4% | 97.2% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 12.7% |
| Median | 7.6% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 12.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Nepal (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Yugoslavian (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |