Bolivian vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Celtics
7.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,453,114 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079 and weighted average of 7.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 17.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.79% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 36.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 36.2% | 97.2% |
Mean | 7.3% | 12.7% |
Median | 6.3% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 12.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bolivians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Carpatho Rusyn (7.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Slovene (7.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (7.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Australia (7.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Turkish (7.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Turks | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Bolivians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |