Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Celtic Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Celtic
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Celtics
7.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Celtic Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,180,585 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 7.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 15.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Celtic |
| Minimum | 0.73% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 19.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 18.3% | 97.2% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 12.7% |
| Median | 6.7% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 12.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Tongan (7.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (7.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Okinawan (7.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (7.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (7.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Slovenes | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Scandinavians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Germans | 99.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Okinawans | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Tongans | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Swiss | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |