Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from Asia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Immigrants from Asia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Immigrants from Asia
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from Asia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,909,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,488,463 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 1.7%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Immigrants from Asia |
Minimum | 1.3% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 17.3% |
Range | 29.4% | 15.0% |
Mean | 8.3% | 7.2% |
Median | 6.4% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Asia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.20%), British (7.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |