Immigrants from South Africa vs Scottish Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Scottish
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Scottish
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Scottish Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,909,353 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 562,331,846 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Scottish |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.4% | 97.7% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 20.4% |
| Median | 6.4% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 15.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 22.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 22.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Scottish by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Welsh (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Asia (7.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.15%), British (7.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |