Immigrants from Oceania vs Cajun Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Cajun
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Cajuns
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cajun Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,687,613 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765 and weighted average of 17.5%, a difference of 31.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Cajun |
| Minimum | 10.7% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 44.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.9% | 94.1% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 21.9% |
| Median | 15.5% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 12.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |