Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Congo
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Congo
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Congo Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,087,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 30.7%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Congo |
Minimum | 10.7% | 0.94% |
Maximum | 44.6% | 41.7% |
Range | 33.9% | 40.8% |
Mean | 16.8% | 18.6% |
Median | 15.5% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 21.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |