Immigrants from Oceania vs South American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
South American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
South American Indians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
28.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs South American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,514,214 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 3.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 10.7% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 44.6% | 68.3% |
| Range | 33.9% | 65.9% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 17.0% |
| Median | 15.5% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 22.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 12.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Arab (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Uganda (13.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Delaware (13.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Iraqi (13.7%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
| Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
| Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |