Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Fiji Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Fiji
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Fiji
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
71.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Fiji Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,754,712 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Fiji |
| Minimum | 10.7% | 8.9% |
| Maximum | 44.6% | 21.1% |
| Range | 33.9% | 12.2% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 13.7% |
| Median | 15.5% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Fiji by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |