Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Czech Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Czech
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Czechs
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
51.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Czech Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,156,358 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,498,804 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 29.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Czech |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.69% |
Maximum | 44.8% | 27.6% |
Range | 42.8% | 26.9% |
Mean | 9.0% | 5.4% |
Median | 5.7% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 6.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Bermudan (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Ottawa (5.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |
Spanish | 41.4 /100 | #179 | Average 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.070%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |