Central American Indian vs Czech Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Czech
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Czechs
8.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Czech Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,694,241 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.573 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,498,804 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 106.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Czech |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.69% |
| Maximum | 86.5% | 27.6% |
| Range | 85.3% | 26.9% |
| Mean | 18.9% | 5.4% |
| Median | 10.3% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.8% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.6% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.6% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.5% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Paiute (8.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Dominican (8.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Lumbee (8.3%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (8.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Native/Alaskan (8.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.070%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |