Tongan vs Czech Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Czech
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Czechs
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Czech Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,697,029 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,498,804 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 17.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | Czech |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 0.69% |
| Maximum | 18.0% | 27.6% |
| Range | 17.2% | 26.9% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 5.4% |
| Median | 4.4% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tongans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Pakistani (4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.070%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |