Immigrants from Bolivia vs Bolivian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Bolivian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Bolivians
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Bolivian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,688,041 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,589,682 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 0.050%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Bolivian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 29.9% |
| Range | 20.9% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 8.6% |
| Median | 7.3% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Bolivians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.69%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.64%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |